WebLondon and North Eastern Railway v Berriman [1946] AC 278 Literal Rule can lead to injustice . A railway worker was killed whilst oiling the track. No look out man had been provided. A statute provided compensation payable on death for those 'relaying or repairing' the track. Under the literal rule oiling did not come into either of these ... WebLondon and North Eastern Railway Company v Berriman [1946] 1 All ER 255 Mr Berriman was a railway worker who was hit and killed by a train while he was doing maintenance …
London and North Eastern Railway v Berriman [1946] AC 278
WebDec 8, 2024 · LNE Railway v Berriman Rail worker killed while doing maintenance work. The Fatal Accidents Act had not been a look-out man provided for men working on or near the railway line, 'for the purposes of relaying or repairing it. Court took the words in their literal meaning, maintenance was not covered and Mr's Berriman's claim failed. Fisher v Bell http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Literal-rule.php metcalf 2008
(PDF) 4.1 The need for statutory interpretation
WebLNER v Berriman (1946) -A railway worker was killed whilst oiling rail road. Widow tried to claim compensation, Fatal Accidents Act 1846 stated that a look out should be provided for men working on or near the railway line for purposes of 'relaying and repairing it' WebStatutory Interpretation Statutory Interpretation The 4 rules THE LITERAL RULE CHEESEMAN V DPP (1990) LONDON AND NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY CO V BERRIMAN (1946) … WebDec 1, 2024 · London & North Eastern Railway V Berriman 1946 Shah Alam Asad 2 subscribers Subscribe 91 views 4 years ago -- Created using Powtoon -- Free sign up at http://www.powtoon.com/youtube/ … met cafe pawtucket ri